<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TraceMonkey vs V8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/</link>
	<description>Engineering the Open Web Platform.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:58:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3.1 Beta 3 Candidate zum Download &#124; Reverse Engineer Techblog</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Firefox 3.1 Beta 3 Candidate zum Download &#124; Reverse Engineer Techblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] die Jungs hinter Firefox nun richtig Gas geben! Schenkt man aber der Analyse von Andreas Gal &#8220;Tracemonkey vs. V8&#8221; glauben, wird Tracemonkey schlussendlich als klarer Sieger hervorgehen.  Quelle: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] die Jungs hinter Firefox nun richtig Gas geben! Schenkt man aber der Analyse von Andreas Gal &#8220;Tracemonkey vs. V8&#8221; glauben, wird Tracemonkey schlussendlich als klarer Sieger hervorgehen.  Quelle: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Development Toronto</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Development Toronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The less restrictive LGPL license does not apply the restrictions to other software that merely links with the program. This is mostly used on libraries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The less restrictive LGPL license does not apply the restrictions to other software that merely links with the program. This is mostly used on libraries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS++ &#124; Maister.org.uk</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JS++ &#124; Maister.org.uk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by Sam on 21 Sep 2008 at 12:18 pm &#124; Tagged as: Internets, Web development  The recent massive improvements in JavaScript performance are absolutely awesome for a number of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Sam on 21 Sep 2008 at 12:18 pm | Tagged as: Internets, Web development  The recent massive improvements in JavaScript performance are absolutely awesome for a number of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Color Management and Firefox 3.1 at freakified</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Color Management and Firefox 3.1 at freakified]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 03:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] including a new Javascript engine that is much, much faster than that of 3.0.  In fact, some tests are even indicating that Firefox 3.1 can execute Javascript faster than Google Chrome (which is an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] including a new Javascript engine that is much, much faster than that of 3.0.  In fact, some tests are even indicating that Firefox 3.1 can execute Javascript faster than Google Chrome (which is an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I meant SpiderMonkey ! (not seamonkey)

What I was talking about can be found in more details here : http://news.qooxdoo.org/good-old-firefox

Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant SpiderMonkey ! (not seamonkey)</p>
<p>What I was talking about can be found in more details here : <a href="http://news.qooxdoo.org/good-old-firefox" rel="nofollow">http://news.qooxdoo.org/good-old-firefox</a></p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A personal view at Firefox vs. Chrome &#124; Tiago's Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A personal view at Firefox vs. Chrome &#124; Tiago's Tech Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] out there. However, Mozilla is working on a completely new Javascript engine, TraceMonkey, which at first sight will put a hell of a fight with Chrome&#8217;s V8. Who benefits from this? Us, users, of course. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out there. However, Mozilla is working on a completely new Javascript engine, TraceMonkey, which at first sight will put a hell of a fight with Chrome&#8217;s V8. Who benefits from this? Us, users, of course. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome Harmony &#124; Bits And Buzz</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome Harmony &#124; Bits And Buzz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] they keep fighting it up. Google Chrome got a good PR head-start, but, Mozilla Firefox 3.1 is back in the race with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they keep fighting it up. Google Chrome got a good PR head-start, but, Mozilla Firefox 3.1 is back in the race with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: test</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[test]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think it really matters whether TraceMonkey/V8/SquirrelFishExtreme are a bit faster at certain (synthetic) benchmarks against each other. What matters, and that&#039;s good, is that we will have really, really fast JavaScript in most major browsers in the future. It&#039;s good competition.

Of course it&#039;s especially nice for Firefox since parts of the browser and extensions are written in JS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it really matters whether TraceMonkey/V8/SquirrelFishExtreme are a bit faster at certain (synthetic) benchmarks against each other. What matters, and that&#8217;s good, is that we will have really, really fast JavaScript in most major browsers in the future. It&#8217;s good competition.</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s especially nice for Firefox since parts of the browser and extensions are written in JS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerging browser war: Google Chrome vs. Mozilla Firefox &#171; Sriniani&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emerging browser war: Google Chrome vs. Mozilla Firefox &#171; Sriniani&#8217;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mozilla may come up with more advanced features in its upcoming version of Firefox. Already, it is said that  Javascript VM to be used in Firefox 3.1, TraceMonkey, is much faster than V8, that used by [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozilla may come up with more advanced features in its upcoming version of Firefox. Already, it is said that  Javascript VM to be used in Firefox 3.1, TraceMonkey, is much faster than V8, that used by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SquirrelFish Extreme entre en el juego de los motores JS &#124; aNieto2K</title>
		<link>http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SquirrelFish Extreme entre en el juego de los motores JS &#124; aNieto2K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreasgal.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] de ambos se demostró que los resultados de uno y de otro son prácticamente similares y que mejoran sustancialmente lo que actualmente procesa el Javascript en los navegadores [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de ambos se demostró que los resultados de uno y de otro son prácticamente similares y que mejoran sustancialmente lo que actualmente procesa el Javascript en los navegadores [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

